Legal Opinion

State v. Reid

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 5, 1991No. 9025SC1121PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Judge.

Defendant argues five errors on appeal. For the following reasons, we hold that the trial court did not err and affirm the judgment of 29 March 1990.

This case arises from defendant’s alleged breaking and entering of the Reveo Drug Store in Pinewood Shopping Center in Granite Falls. The evidence at trial tends to show that on 1 February 1988, Charlotte McCorcle, pharmacist assistant manager at Reveo, was called to the store by an activated alarm. Upon entering the store with a sheriff’s deputy, she noticed that drugs on the shelves were in disarray, there were muddy shoe prints and…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. State v. BagleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. PittmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  2. State v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. State v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  4. State v. PittmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API