United States v. Tamara Lenise Martin
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge:
Tamara Lenise Martin appeals the district court’s calculation of her criminal history category. She contends that the court erred in including a prior state sentence for misdemeanor larceny, which had been imposed by a North Carolina district court, and was being considered de novo by a North Carolina superior court at the time of the federal sentencing. Because execution of the state sentence was stayed pending the trial de novo, the district court erred in attributing two criminal history points to that prior sentence pursuant to U.S. Sentencing…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Justices of Boston Municipal Court v. LydonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ludwig v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. SparrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Smith v. PotterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Bryan v. BellSouth Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. FlorentinoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Ashton v. City of Concord, North CarolinaDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004
- Poole v. DotsonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.