Legal Opinion
Finney v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided April 30, 1986No. 1-1185A289PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RATLIFF, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Arthur R. Finney appeals his conviction of driving a motor vehicle when his blood alcohol content was .10% or greater, as a class D felony, 1 contending the statute under which he was charged is unconstitutional, and that the class C misdemeanor charge was an insufficient basis for enhancement to a class D felony. We affirm.
FACTS
An Indiana State Police Officer observed Finney driving a vehicle on U.S. Highway 41 in Evansville on November 20, 1984. The vehicle crossed the center line four or five times and was being driven in an erratic manner. The officer…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Johnson v. St. Vincent Hospital, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1980
- Elmore v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
- Fuenning v. SUPER. CT. IN AND FOR CTY. OF MARICOPAArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Sidle v. MajorsIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. TannerOhio Supreme Court · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Platt v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Regan v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- St. John v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
- Mehidal v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Myers v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.