Legal Opinion
Sewell v. New York City Transit Authority
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided December 30, 1992No. CV-90-3734, CV-91-1274PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GLASSER, District Judge:
In the above-captioned actions, the pro se plaintiff, Lee Sewell, alleges that the defendants discriminated against him in the workplace. Plaintiff brought the first action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the second action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. Plaintiff now moves for summary judgment in both actions and defendants cross-move for summary judgment in both actions. For the following reasons, plaintiffs motion is denied and defendants’ motion is granted in both actions.
FACTS
The parties do not dispute any…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Claps v. Moliterno Stone Sales, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1993
- Costello v. St. Francis HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
- Stulberg v. Intermedics Orthopedics, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
- Time Warner Cable of New York City LLC v. International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- Ammcon, Inc. v. KempDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.