Legal Opinion

Claps v. Moliterno Stone Sales, Inc.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided March 29, 1993No. 2:90-cv-00519PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

JOSÉ A CABRANES, Chief Judge:

This is an action for damages and injunctive relief under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and under Connecticut state law. The plaintiff is a stonemason who was employed by defendant Moliterno Stone Sales, Inc. (“Moliterno Stone”), during the construction of the Connecticut Financial Center in New Haven, Connecticut. She alleges that the defendants discriminated against her on the basis of her gender by creating a hostile work environment.

Pending before the court are two motions for summary judgment filed…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Tolliver v. Kroger Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Sandy Diana Hirras v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, D/B/A AmtrakCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  3. Humphrey v. Council of Jewish FederationsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  4. Rosenberg v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
  5. Almonte v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of New York, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1997

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API