Zell v. Erie Bronze Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
In Equity. Suit by Frank D. Zell against the Erie Bronze Company and others. On motion to set aside service.
1Opinion of the Court
Facts.
DICKINSON, District Judge.
The cause is a patent case, and the proceeding is one against the defendants jointly for a joint trespass upon the patenfrights of plaintiff. The ground of jurisdiction of the subject-matter is that a law of the United States is involved. Jurisdiction with respect to parties is based upon the fact of the service of the bill. One of the defendants is an inhabitant of this district and was here served. The other defendants are inhabitants of the city of Erie, and the service upon them was extraterritorial; they having been served in the Western district. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re HohorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- In Re Keasbey & Mattison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Bowers v. Atlantic, G. & P. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1900
- Cheatham Electric Switching Device Co. v. Transit Development Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1911
- United Shoe Machinery Co. v. Duplessis Independent Shoe Machinery Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Stonite Products Co. v. Melvin Lloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Motoshaver, Inc. v. Schick Dry Shaver, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Melvin Lloyd Co. v. Stonite Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Schick Dry Shaver, Inc. v. Motoshaver, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1937
- Potter v. Hook Scraper Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.