Legal Opinion
Melvin Lloyd Co. v. Stonite Products Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 13, 1941No. 7636PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARIS, Circuit Judge.
Stonite Products Company was sued jointly with Lowe Supply Company in the District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania for infringement of a patent for a boiler stand'. Both defendants are Pennsylvania corporations. Each was served where it had its principal place of business, Lowe in the Western District, Stonite in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Lowe defaulted and the suit proceeded to judgment against it. Stonite entered a special appearance and moved to dismiss or quash the return of service. The district court granted the motion, quashed the return…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. FreemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- In Re HohorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- In Re Keasbey & Mattison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Petri v. F. E. Creelman Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Stonite Products Co. v. Melvin Lloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- De George v. Mandata Poultry CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
- In Re: Bigcommerce, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Boswell v. South Carolina InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Patten Grading & Paving, Inc. v. Skanska USA Building, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.