Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank of Sallisaw v. Ballard

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 28, 1914No. 3141PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error from County Court, Sequoyah County; W. N. Littlejohn, Judge. Action by the First National Bank of ‘Sallisaw against C. ■B. Ballard, B. F. Moody, and W. H. Brackett, on promissory note. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THACKER, C.

The position of the parties-in respect to their descriptive titles remains the same as in the trial court; but, having no occasion to refer to the sureties, we will hereinafter refer to the principal debtor alone as ‘‘defendant.”

Plaintiff has filed case-made and, in compliance with the rules of court, has served and filed his brief; but the defendants in. error have neither filed nor offered any excuse for failure to file a brief; and, in such cases, this court is not required to search the record to find a theory upon which the judgment may be sustained, but may reverse…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Sanders v. KnoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  2. Johnson v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Caldwell v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887
  4. Doyle v. School Dist. No. 38, Noble CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Flanagan v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Frost v. HaleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. De Hart Oil Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Obialero v. Henryetta Spelter Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Harrison v. M. Koehler Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Security Trust & Savings Bank v. JuneArizona Supreme Court · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API