Legal Opinion

Security Trust & Savings Bank v. June

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1931No. Civil No. 2951PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

Security Trust & Savings Bank, a corporation, hereinafter called plaintiff, brought suit against Lee June and J. E. Helton, hereinafter called defendants, on a promissory note in the sum of $400. June filed a separate answer, admitting the execution of the note by himself and his co-defendant, but alleged that he executed it as accommodation maker only, and that at the time he signed it, it was secured by a chattel mortgage on certain cotton, maize, and wheat to be grown during the crop season of 1926 by defendant Helton; that thereafter Helton did grow and harvest twelve bales of cotton,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Crane Co. v. Pacific Heat & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Gore v. . TownsendSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. California National Bank v. GintyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Beaver Trust Co. v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  5. Consolidated Naval Stores Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1921

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Citizens Bank of Smithville v. LairMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Holt v. Western Farm Services, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1974
  3. American Mutual Building & Loan Co. v. KeslerIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Mid-Continent Supply Co., a Corporation v. Atkins & Potter Drilling Corp., a Corporation T. E. Atkins and W. L. PotterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
  5. Farmers State Bank, Grafton v. HuebnerCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API