Doyle v. School Dist. No. 38, Noble County
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Noble County; W. M. Bowles, Judge. Action by Thomas H. Doyle and Parker W. Cress against School District No. 38, Noble County, and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error. Action begun in the justice court of Noble county, on May 8, 1906, by Doyle & Cress, partners, as plaintiffs, to recover the sum of $75, as an attorney’s fee, alleged to be due them for certain professional services rendered said school district.
Read the full summary
Error from District Court, Noble County; W. M. Bowles, Judge. Action by Thomas H. Doyle and Parker W. Cress against School District No. 38, Noble County, and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error. Action begun in the justice court of Noble county, on May 8, 1906, by Doyle & Cress, partners, as plaintiffs, to recover the sum of $75, as an attorney’s fee, alleged to be due them for certain professional services rendered said school district. It appears that, at the time of the commencement of said suit, and prior thereto, one Richard Hansing was director, and Oby Olson was…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
ROBERTSON, C.
(after stating facts as above). Plaintiffs in error, in accordance with the rules of this court, have compléted an appeal and filed an exhaustive and able brief in support of the errors complained of, and, although more than a year has elapsed since the filing of their brief, the defendants have failed to file any brief in support of their judgment; nor have they offered any excuse for their failure to do so. The following rule of this court is therefore applicable:
“Where plaintiff in error has completed his record, and filed in this court, and has served and filed a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ellis v. OutlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Butler v. McSpaddenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- School District No. 39, Pottawatomie County v. SheltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Pendleton County v. AmySupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Buckner v. Oklahoma National Bank of ShawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bolling v. CampbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Phillips v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- First Nat. Bank of Sallisaw v. BallardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Miles v. BirdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Midland Elevator Co. v. HarrahSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.