De Hart Oil Co. v. Smith
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from County Court, Rogers County; H. Tom Right, Judge. Replevin by the De Hart Oil Company against Earl Smith and another.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
THACKER, C.
Plaintiffs in error, as plaintiffs below, alleging ownership and right of immediate possession in themselves and that defendants in error, who were defendants below, unlawfully and wrongfully detained in their possession certain personal property of the value of $400, to their damage by the detention amounting to $200, brought this action in re-plevin for said property and said damages; and the defendants, besides certain affirmative allegations which at best do not enlarge the issues raised by a general denial (Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. Mayfield, Constable, et al., 36…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Payne v. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
- First Nat. Bank of Sallisaw v. BallardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Street v. MorganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
- Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. MayfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
3Cited by11 opinions
- Francis v. Guaranty State Bank of TexolaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Frost v. HaleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Johnson v. City of VinitaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Obialero v. Henryetta Spelter Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Harrison v. M. Koehler Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.