Legal Opinion
Royal Bank & Trust Co. v. Superintendent of Insurance
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 24, 1990PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Ira Gammerman, J.
In this CPLR article 78 proceeding, petitioner the Royal Bank and Trust Company (Royal) seeks a judgment annulling the determination of the respondent Superintendent of Insur*865anee denying New York Property/Casualty Insurance Security Fund (the Security Fund) coverage for certain claims made upon investor bonds and surety bonds issued by the now defunct Union Indemnity Insurance Company of New York (Union). These claims arose out of a private placement of shares in Harlan, Ltd., a Kentucky limited partnership, engaged in coal mining in Kentucky and the loan…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re Charles A. Field Delivery Service, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- In re the Liquidation of Consolidated Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Snyder Tank Corp. v. Superintendent of InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1988
- In Re the Ancillary Receivership of Interstate InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- First National Bank v. Rob-Glen Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re the Liquidation of Union Indemnity InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- In re Liquidation of Union Indemnity Ins.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re the Liquidation of Union Indemnity InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- In Re the Liquidation of Union Indemnity InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- In re the Liquidatioin of Union Indemnity InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996