Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re the Liquidation of Union Indemnity Insurance

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 11, 1998Published

1DissentLevine, J.

I respectfully dissent. I disagree with the majority’s proposition that all questions in this case regarding “what the Legislature allowed or prohibited under the Security Fund scheme [are] matters substantive and preserved for independent judicial assessment” (majority opn, at 115 [emphasis supplied]). The Superintendent of Insurance has the central role in the administration of both the liquidation of an insolvent insurer and of the New York Property/Casualty Insurance Security Fund. The procedures for liquidating the insolvent insurer’s estate and for claims against the Security Fund are…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kurcsics v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. In re Charles A. Field Delivery Service, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. People v. . American Loan Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. Matter of Empire State Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. New York Public Interest Research Group, Inc. v. New York State Department of InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API