In Re the Liquidation of Union Indemnity Insurance
New York Court of Appeals
1DissentLevine, J.
I respectfully dissent. I disagree with the majority’s proposition that all questions in this case regarding “what the Legislature allowed or prohibited under the Security Fund scheme [are] matters substantive and preserved for independent judicial assessment” (majority opn, at 115 [emphasis supplied]). The Superintendent of Insurance has the central role in the administration of both the liquidation of an insolvent insurer and of the New York Property/Casualty Insurance Security Fund. The procedures for liquidating the insolvent insurer’s estate and for claims against the Security Fund are…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Kurcsics v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- In re Charles A. Field Delivery Service, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. . American Loan Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Matter of Empire State Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
- New York Public Interest Research Group, Inc. v. New York State Department of InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.