Legal Opinion
Snyder Tank Corp. v. Superintendent of Insurance
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 2, 1988PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Ira Gammerman, J.
Does New York Property/Casualty Insurance Security Fund (Security Fund) provide coverage to an insured who manufactures a product in New York when that product allegedly causes personal injury in another State? The New York Superintendent of Insurance (Superintendent) has ruled that there is no coverage and the court agrees.
This is a combined CPLR article 78 proceeding and declaratory judgment action challenging the Superintendent’s denial of Snyder Tank Corp.’s (Snyder) claim for coverage under the New York Security Fund.
Snyder is a manufacturer of fuel…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re the Liquidation of Union Indemnity InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Royal Bank & Trust Co. v. Superintendent of InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1990
- In re the Liquidation of Midland InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1990
- In re the Ancillary Receivership of Reliance InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Paramount Communications, Inc. v. Gibraltar Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.