Legal Opinion

Higgins v. Detroit Osteopathic Hospital Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 16, 1986No. Docket 82569PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal is the result of directed verdicts for defendants in this medical malpractice suit. Two issues are raised. One deals with the court’s determination of whether a witness is competent to testify as an expert. The other concerns the protections of the "Good Samaritan” act when an outside doctor is contacted by a hospital on behalf of a patient.

The facts center around the birth and first few hours of Jamie Lynn Higgins’ life, and can be stated briefly for purposes of this appeal. After birth at defendant Riverside Osteopathic Hospital, the delivery doctors, defendants David Wolf, D.O.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gibbard v. CursanMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Burnett v. City of AdrianMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Siirila v. BarriosMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Croda v. SarnackiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. LeBlanc v. LentiniMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jennings v. SouthwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Hardingham v. United Counseling Service of Bennington County, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  3. Mallory v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Clayton v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  5. Mazey v. AdamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API