Legal Opinion

Hardingham v. United Counseling Service of Bennington County, Inc.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 22, 1995No. 94-096PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

Plaintiff David Hardingham, who was blinded as the result of drinking windshield wiper fluid during an alcoholic binge, appeals the superior court’s orders granting summary judgment in favor of defendants, whom plaintiff accused of negligently assisting him while he was intoxicated. In an earlier opinion, Hardingham v. United Counseling Service of Bennington, 164 Vt. 158, 667 A.2d 289 (1995), we resolved all issues raised on appeal except for the issue of whether the superior court erred in ruling that, as a matter of law, defendants’ conduct did not amount to gross negligence. We ordered the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Amb. Serv.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  2. Shaw, Admr. v. MooreSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  3. Kelly v. Town of BarnardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  4. Youngblood v. SchiremanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  5. Deyo v. KinleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Powers v. Office of Child SupportSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  2. Braun v. Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  3. Mellin v. Flood Brook Union School DistrictSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  4. Kane v. LamotheSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  5. Kennery v. State of Vermont, Valcourt, LaBombard and Other Members of the Dept. of Public SafetySupreme Court of Vermont · 2011

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API