Legal Opinion

Burnett v. City of Adrian

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1982No. 63981, (Calendar No. 1)PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J.

This is an appeal from a Court of Appeals affirmance of a summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs’ case for failure to state an actionable claim under the so-called recreational use statute, MCL 300.201; MSA 13.1485. The only question before us is whether the plaintiffs have alleged facts sufficient to state a claim for gross *454negligence or willful and wanton misconduct.1 Our task is thus limited because the recreational use law authorizes recovery in the circumstances of this case only if gross negligence or willful and wanton misconduct is shown.

We agree that no actionable claim for gross…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gibbard v. CursanMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Thomas v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Thone v. NicholsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. State v. ShumakeTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Odom v. Wayne CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  3. In Re Air Crash Disaster.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  4. Jennings v. SouthwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Christian Kreipke v. Wayne State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API