Takehara v. H. C. Muddox Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERS, J.
The parties to this appeal are all judgment creditors of H. C. Muddox Company. Muddox recovered a judgment for $24,000 against certain parties not involved in this appeal on July 16, 1968. Prior thereto, on October 20, 1965, Mission Clay Products, respondent herein, obtained an order granting it a lien on the Muddox cause of action and any subsequent judgment pursuant to section 688.1 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Between March and June of 1968, the three appellants herein obtained orders granting liens on the Muddox cause of action. The trial court ruled that the Mission…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McClearen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Del Conte Masonry Co. v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Hersch v. Boston InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Turner v. DonovanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Hertweck v. FearonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
3Cited by13 opinions
- Cetenko v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- In the Matter of Andrew Kanter and Carole Kanter, Bankrupts. Andrew R. Kanter and Carole Kanter v. Richard M. Moneymaker, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Salaman v. BoltCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Muller v. Fresno Community Hospital & Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Brienza v. TepperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.