Wiltse v. State Road Bridge Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Saginaw. (Gage, J.) Case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.
The defendant in this case is a corporation, owning and maintaining a toll-bridge spanning the Tittabawassee river, about three miles west of the city of Saginaw, where the Gratiot State road crosses the river.
The bridge is about 160 rods in length, and consists of an *640east and west approach, each being about 70 rods long, and: an iron bridge over the waters about 20 rods in length. The toll-house is near the channel bank on the east approach. It stands on piles on the side of, and on a level with, the bridge. The roadway of the bridge at the toll-house, for a-distance of about 50 feet, is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wright v. J. & S. WilcoxNew York Supreme Court · 1838
- Thompson v. Flint & Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Baker v. KinseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
3Cited by7 opinions
- Quinn v. RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
- Haggerty v. St. Louis, Keokuk & Northwestern RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
- Ford v. Louisiana & A. Ry. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1940
- Congdon v. Louisiana Sawmill Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
- Kincade v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.