Baker v. Kinsey
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Sixth District, Sacramento County. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSanderson, J.
This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained from a bite by a vicious dog. The plaintiff was nonsuited as to Eastman, one of the defendants, but recovered as against the others, Kinsey and Dyer. Kinsey moved for a new trial without success, and then brought the case here, and asks a reversal upon the grounds, First-—That so far as he is concerned, the verdict is not sustained by the testimony; and, Second—That in respect to him, the charge *633of the Court was erroneous. But a separate consideration of these grounds is not deemed necessary.
The testimony shows that the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hay v. Cohoes Co.New York Supreme Court · 1848
- Wilkinson v. ParrottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Boswell v. LairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gousse v. LoweCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Hudson v. M. K. & T. Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1876
- St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. v. HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Holt v. LeslieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
- Muehlebach v. Paso Robles Springs HotelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.