Kincade v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Appanoose District Court. — Iíon. M. A. Boberts, Judge. Action to recover for personal injuries. At tbe close of plaintiff’s case tbe court ordered a verdict for defendant. Erom tbe judgment rendered tbereon, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtWaterman, J.
1 Plaintiff was in the employ of defendant company as a section hand. At the time of his injury he was returning from work in company with nine other employes, on a hand car. Plaintiff stood on the front of the car, facing to the rear. He had hold of the lever, and was aiding in propelling the car. Two of his companions engaged in a political discussion. One of them (McCoy) was standing on the right of the plaintiff. Th.e other (Howard) was on his left. This discussion culminated in McCoy striking at Howard. The latter, in attempting to avoid, the blow, pushed against plaintiff, throwing him…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Morier v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Golden v. NewbrandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
- Keating v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Cobb v. Columbia, &c., RailroadSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1892
- Curtis v. DinneenSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1886
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dolan v. HubingerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Nesbit v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Everingham v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- Healy v. PattersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Johnson v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.