Legal Opinion

Lynn v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 28, 1993No. 450PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUDOCK, Judge:

Robert Lynn and Dolores Camacho (Appellants) appeal from the order of the trial court granting summary judgment in favor of Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company (Appellee) regarding all claims Appellants had against Appellee. We affirm.

The parties stipulated to the facts pertinent to the case: On December 5, 1989, Appellant Robert Lynn and Appellee entered into a contract of insurance which provided, inter alia, first party benefits under the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (MVFRL). 1 The contract of insurance was effective from that date…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. DeBenedictisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Schacter v. AlbertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Beaver County Building & Loan Ass'n v. WinowichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. McFadden v. American Oil Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  5. Amabile v. Auto Kleen Car WashSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stroback v. CamaioniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Okkerse v. Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Adelphia Cablevision Associates of Radnor, L.P. v. University City Housing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Frey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Prousi v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API