Stroback v. Camaioni
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
McEWEN, Judge.
We are here asked to determine whether the amendments to Section 1722 of the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law, effective July 1, 1990, (hereinafter Act 6), are applicable in a third-party tort action to preclude recovery of medical expenses arising from a motor vehicle accident which occurred on March 15, 1990, some three months before the effective date of Act 6. The trial court found that the amendments could not, pursuant to the express terms of the statute or constitutional principles relating to retroactivity, be found to be applicable to medical expenses arising…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Universal Cyclops Steel Corp. v. KrawczynskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- W. B. Worthen Co. v. KavanaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Abboud v. Ground Round, Inc. (In Re Ground Round, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Konidaris v. Portnoff Law Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Cooper v. SirotaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Schroeder v. SchraderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Friends of Pennsylvania Leadership Charter School v. Chester County Board of Assessment AppealsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.