Legal Opinion

Manchester Manufacturing Acquisitions, Inc. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided September 26, 1995No. 1:16-adr-00008PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DEVINE, Senior District Judge.

In this diversity action, plaintiffs Manchester Manufacturing Acquisitions, Inc., Gary A. Dineo, and Felix J. Weingart, Jr., allege that defendants 1 violated federal and state securities laws and made negligent misrepresentations in connection with the 1988 sale of the distribution warehouse business known as Manchester Manufacturing, Inc. (MMI). 2

Presently before the court is defendants’ motion for summary judgment and plaintiffs’ cross-motion for summary judgment, along with respective objections thereto. In addition, defendants have filed, over…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. FormanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Thomasina Mack v. The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dinco v. Dylex LimitedCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  2. Reisman v. KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLPDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997
  3. Eaves v. EavesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000
  4. Dinco v. Dylex LimitedCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API