Legal Opinion
Reisman v. KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided February 28, 1997No. Civ. A. 96-10521-WGYPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND DECISION
YOUNG, District Judge.
1. Introduction
The plaintiffs Howard, Amalia, Galite, Kenneth, and Talia Reisman (the “Reismans”), and a related company, Amgata Holdings Ltd. 1 (“Amgata,” collectively “the plaintiffs”) come before this Court having sued the local office of an international public accounting firm, KPMG Peat Marwick LLP (“Peat Marwick”). In their Complaint, 2 the plaintiffs allege that Peat Marwick violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5 (Count I), and engaged in unfair and deceptive trade practices under Mass.Gen.L. ch. 93A…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Carden v. Arkoma AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Valerie Watterson v. Eileen PageCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Reisman v. KPMG Peat Marwick LLPMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
- John Beaudette, Inc. v. Sentry Insurance a Mutual Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
- Cohen v. KurtzmanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- JMTR Enterprises, L.L.C. v. DuchinDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
- In Re Segue Software, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.