Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Dikeman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 11, 1915No. 19,755PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Chautauqua district court; Allison T. Ayres, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

G. F. Dikeman and several sureties executed a negotiable note for $1475 to the Havana State Bank. The note was endorsed before maturity to the First National Bank of Elk City, which brought action upon it. Dikeman filed an *766answer to this effect: At the time of the execution of the note he claimed that he had previously deposited $625 with the bank, for which he had never received credit; it was agreed between him and the payee that this matter should be investigated, and if his contention proved correct he should be allowed a credit for that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McNight v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  2. Underwood v. FoshaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  3. Bruce v. Citizens National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  4. Carter v. MoultonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  5. Leavens v. HooverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. EmerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. First Nat. Bank v. BaileyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API