First Nat. Bank v. Bailey
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff, a national bank at Le Sueur, Minnesota, claims to have purchased the negotiable note in suit, "In due course."
The defendants were operating an elevator at Mooreton, North Dakota, at the time the note was executed, and they alleged in their answer that the payee E.L. Welch Co. was a corporation of large financial standing engaged in handling grain on commission in Minneapolis and Duluth. That it was a custom of commission merchants to keep an open account with country shippers, and credit thereon, the proceeds of such shipments and to charge to such account, all drafts drawn by…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Innerarity v. Merchants' National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
- King v. DoaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Forbes v. First Nat. Bank of EnidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- McPherrin v. TittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- First National Bank v. FlathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Baird v. ReinertsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
- Baird v. PerryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
- McGuckin v. WolskyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
- Nybakken v. BairdNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928