Legal Opinion

Carolina Portland Cement Co. v. Baumgartner

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 5, 1930PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

This is an appeal by the complainant in the court below from an order of the chancellor, denying the application of complainant for the appointment of a receiver in foreclosure proceedings. The bill for foreclosure, which was sworn to, was filed in October, 1928. It alleged that the defendants, Baumgartner and wife, on the 25th day of November, A. D. 1927, executed and delivered to the Hearn Construction Company their note for twenty-five thousand, two hundred and fifty dollars ($25,250.00). To secure its payment they also contemporaneously executed and delivered their mortgage encumbering…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Freedman's Saving & Trust Co. v. ShepherdSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. First National Bank v. Illinois Steel Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Cross v. Will County National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Pasco v. GambleSupreme Court of Florida · 1876
  5. Apalachicola Northern Railroad Co. v. SommersSupreme Court of Florida · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Wackenhut Corp. v. CantySupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  2. Michelsen v. PenneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  3. Ellard v. GodwinSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  4. In Re Aloma Square, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1988
  5. In Re Camelot Associates Ltd. PartnershipUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1989

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API