St. John v. Peterson
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1.] Lita St. John sued Dr. Linda Peterson alleging medical malpractice in repairing a vesicovaginal fistula. The jury entered a verdict for Dr. Peterson. St. John appeals, arguing that the trial court erred in excluding evidence of other cases where Dr. Peterson had failed to repair vesicovaginal fistulas. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
[¶2.] Dr. Peterson was treating St. John for stress incontinence and menstrual problems. In May 2006, Dr. Peterson performed a hysterectomy on St. John. The parties agree that the hysterectomy was medically necessary. Within two weeks…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. MattsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Supreme Pork, Inc. v. Master Blaster, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Kostel v. SchwartzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Novak v. McEldowneySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Bertelsen v. Allstate Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. CarterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
- State v. FisherSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. JuchtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Stabler v. First State Bank of RoscoeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.