Commercial Nat. Bank v. Latham
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Brro'r from District Court, Oklahoma County; Geo. W. Clark, Judge. Action by Haidee W. Latham against the Commercial National Bank. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.
This is a suit in damages brought by Mrs. Haidee W. Latham, defendant in error, as plaintiff, in the dis trict court of Oklahoma count)'-, against the Commercial National Bank, plaintiff in error, for wrongfully refusing to pay her draft drawn against her own funds on deposit in said bank. There was trial to a jury and verdict and judgment for plaintiff for $1,069, and defendant brings the case here.
It is assigned for error that the judgment is excessive and unsupported by the evidence. There is no material conflict in the testimony. The evidence discloses that from August 29 to November 15,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Patterson v. Marine N. BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
- First National Bank v. MasonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
- Schaffner v. EhrmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
- Morrison v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
3Cited by6 opinions
- Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- First Nat. Bank v. StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Shaw v. Union Bank and Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Meinhart v. Farmers State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
- Shaw v. Union Bank and Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.