People v. Sedita
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*639In reviewing an attorney’s motion to be relieved pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), this Court must first “ ‘satisfy itself that the attorney has provided the client with a diligent and thorough search of the record for any arguable claim that might support the client’s appeal’ ” (Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252, 255 [2011], quoting Penson v Ohio, 488 US 75, 83 [1988]). As this Court explained in Matter of Giovanni S., “counsel must, at a minimum, draw the Court’s attention to the relevant evidence, with specific references to the record; identify and assess…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- People v. SeabergNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- In re Giovanni S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. SingletonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- People v. DeprosperisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. RiveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. SwensonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. RandolphAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. MurrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.