Legal Opinion
People v. Singleton
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 12, 2012PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*910The brief submitted by the appellant’s counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]) was deficient because it failed to contain any statement of facts and failed to analyze potential appellate issues or highlight facts in the record that might arguably support the appeal (see People v Sanders, 91 AD3d 798, 799 [2012]; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252, 256 [2011]). Inasmuch as the brief does not demonstrate that assigned counsel acted “as an active advocate on behalf of his . . . client” (Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d at 256 [internal quotation marks…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- In re Giovanni S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. SandersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. FosterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
3Cited by81 opinions
- People v. SeditaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. McNairAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. DeprosperisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. RiveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.