Legal Opinion
Stuart Painting Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 8, 1992No. 1808 C.D. 1991PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NARICK, Senior Judge.
Stuart Painting Company (Stuart) petitions for review of an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, reversing a referee’s dismissal of Dionysios Asvestas’ (Claimant) petition for reinstatement of total disability benefits. We affirm.
On September 22, 1986, Claimant sustained a work-related injury to his lower back while employed by Stuart. Claimant received total disability benefits. On January 21, 1988, Stuart filed a suspension petition, alleging that Claimant had refused reasonable medical service and requested that the referee “suspend payments to the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pieper v. Ametek-Thermox Instruments DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Muse v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Robachinski v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Petcovic v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
3Cited by6 opinions
- Farance v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Commonwealth, Department of Labor & Industry v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Com. v. WCAB (Exel Logistics)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth, Department of Labor & Industry v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Sun Oil Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.