Legal Opinion
Commonwealth, Department of Labor & Industry v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 30, 2005PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice EAKIN.
Exel Logistics appeals from the order of the Commonwealth Court reversing the order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB), which granted Super-sedeas Fund reimbursement. We affirm.
Appellant issued a notice of compensation payable after claimant sustained a work-related shoulder injury while employed at appellant’s business in May, 1993. In August, 1997, pursuant to § 306(f.l)(8)1 of the Workers’ Compensation Act, appellant filed a petition for forfeiture, alleging claimant refused reasonable medical treatment, and requested a supersedeas while its petition was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Daniels v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Pieper v. Ametek-Thermox Instruments DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Hannaberry HVAC v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Insurance Co. of North America v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mark v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Land O'Lakes, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- J.P. Lamb Construction, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Boeing Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Boeing Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.