Legal Opinion

Muse v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 11, 1987No. 23 E.D. Appeal Docket 1986PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McDERMOTT, Justice.

On February 16, 1973, Lester R. Muse (hereinafter “claimant”) suffered a bilateral hernia which was classified as a work-related injury. Surgery was performed on June 23, 1973, to correct the impairment and a final receipt was executed on November 21, 1973, with regard to the claimant’s workmen’s compensation benefits. Benefits were thereafter reinstated in 1977 when it was discovered that the surgery had caused the atrophy of the claimant’s right *3testicle together with the contraction of the right spermatic cord. The referee found that the cause of this condition…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Katz v. Evening BulletinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Muse v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Joyce Western Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Acme Markets, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Farance v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Braun Baking Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Sears v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API