Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Sun Oil Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 16, 1993No. 452 C.D. 1992Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSilvestri, Senior Judge

Sun Oil Company (Sun Oil) does not challenge the award of medical expenses incurred as a result of surgeries and treatments to the cervical portion of Beverly K. Thompson’s (Thompson’s) spine1 nor does it contest, with the noted excep*444tion of the years 1984-1986, the referee’s finding that Thompson was disabled from any gainful employment2 due to the injuries sustained in the October 20, 1976 motor vehicle accident. I concur insofar as the majority affirms the award of compensation benefits and medical expenses that are not in dispute; however, I disagree with the majority’s affirmance in all…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pieper v. Ametek-Thermox Instruments DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Stuart Painting Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API