In re the Marriage of Westendorf
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.
Husband appeals a dissolution judgment, assigning error to the trial court’s division of property, specifically, the parties’ retirement accounts. He argues that the trial court should have applied the “time rule” to the division of the accounts. We conclude that, because husband did not request the trial court to apply the time rule to the parties’ retirement accounts, he is precluded from doing so for the first time on appeal. We therefore affirm without expressing any opinion on the propriety of using the time rule in the circumstances of this case.
Husband has worked as a teacher since…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Davis v. O'BRIENOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Matter of Marriage of RichardsonOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- In re the Marriage of ButlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Marvin Wood Products v. CallowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Fred Meyer Stores v. GodfreyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Fred Meyer Stores v. GodfreyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- In re the Marriage of StaplesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- State v. PollardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2013