Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Pollard

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided August 30, 2013No. CR-10-1560Published

1DissentWindom, Presiding Judge

The State did not argue in the circuit court that the vehicle in which George Willie Pollard was traveling was properly stopped because the driver of the vehicle had an outstanding warrant for his arrest. Instead, the State argued only that a computer message from “Meth Alert” provided reasonable suspicion to stop Pollard.7 *834Therefore, I do not believe that the issue upon which the majority reverses the circuit court’s judgment was preserved for this Court’s review. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent.

This Court has repeatedly held that “ ‘[arguments not specifically raised before the trial…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Andrews v. Merritt Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Fischer v. FischerKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Lloyd Noland Hosp. v. DurhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  4. In the Matter of Dennis R. Kroner, Debtor. Appeal of David R. Herzog, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  5. Goodson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API