Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Staples

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 18, 2007No. 033387D4; A128272Published

1Opinion of the CourtHuckleberry, J.

pro tempore

Wife appeals a judgment of dissolution, contending that the trial court erred in ordering her to pay child support and in ordering spousal support for only three years. Because we find that wife’s arguments are not preserved, we affirm.

The parties were married for 10 years and have three children together. Custody of the children was granted to husband. Wife also has a child from a previous relationship, who they raised as husband’s daughter. Guardianship of that child was granted to husband. Wife is diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (MS) and borderline personality disorder.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. In re the Marriage of WestendorfCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. In re the Marriage of McDuffyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API