Legal Opinion

Butler v. Flo-Ron Vending Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 30, 1989No. 3200, 3252PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*637ROWLEY, Judge:

These cross-appeals by all the parties are from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff, Gibson Butler (Butler), in an action against Flo-Ron Vending Co., Inc. (Flo-Ron), Milton Friedberg, Estelle Friedberg,1 Lee Friedberg and Barry Friedberg, to recover compensatory and punitive damages for: (1) intentional infliction of emotional distress; (2) defamation; (3) invasion of privacy; (4) malicious prosecution; (5) malicious abuse of process; (6) injurious falsehood; and (7) false imprisonment.

The facts giving rise to this action are as follows. On April 20,…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Laudenberger v. Port Auth. of AlleghenySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Burrell v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Pirillo v. PirilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Jones Et Vir v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Fitzgerald v. McCutcheonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Cna v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  2. P. Brian Brumfield v. Sherri Sanders Michelle Shadday Brenda Derr-Blakeney M. Jane Huff Carla Meyers United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  3. Krajsa v. Keypunch, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Aliota v. GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  5. Kull v. GuisseCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API