Legal Opinion

Miller v. Mitchell

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 15, 1991PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

245 N.J. Super. 290 (1991)

585 A.2d 414

HELEN MILLER, EARL B. ROBINSON, FRANCIS M. MEEKS, III, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

v.

HAROLD MITCHELL, MAYOR, CITY OF PLAINFIELD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND CITY OF PLAINFIELD PLANNING BOARD, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued December 5, 1990.

Decided January 15, 1991.

Before Judges KING, LONG and STERN.

Michele R. Donato argued the cause for appellant.

Eric Martin Bernstein argued the cause for respondents.

The opinion of the court was delivered by STERN, J.A.D.

This appeal requires us to resolve a conflict between the provisions of a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Schmidt v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, CITY OF NEWARKSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  3. Kimmelman v. Henkels & McCoy, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  4. TAXPAYERS ASSN. OF WEYMOUTH TP. INC. v. Weymouth Tp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  5. Malone v. FenderSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Paramus Substantive Certification No. 47New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API