Legal Opinion

Paramus Substantive Certification No. 47

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 24, 1991PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

KING, P.J.A.D.

This appeal requires us to interpret the so-called “Fanwood Bill,” L. 1989, c. 142; N.J.S.A. 52:27D-311.1 and 313.1, effective August 3, 1989. That act amends the Fair Housing Act, N.J.S.A. 52:27D-301 to -329, by prohibiting the Council on Affordable Housing (COAH) from requiring municipalities seeking substantive certification to consider as available for affordable housing sites already improved with sound residential structures. The act was adopted shortly after COAH ordered the Borough of Fanwood to consider as available small parcels…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mayflower Securities Co. v. Bureau of SecuritiesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  2. Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount LaurelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  3. Gibbons v. GibbonsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  4. Kimmelman v. Henkels & McCoy, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  5. Matter of Board of Educ. of Town of BoontonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. No Illegal Points v. FlorioNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
  2. Longo v. MARKET TRANSIT. FACILITYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
  3. In re Eligibility of Certain Assistant Union County ProsecutorsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  4. Bruning v. Eckman Funeral HomeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  5. Brown v. WilliamsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API