Legal Opinion

Bagby v. Cleveland Wrecking Co.

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided June 23, 1939No. Civ. 78PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, District Judge.

The plaintiffs seek to recover wages and damages by reason of alleged violation on the part of the defendant of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., being the Federal Statute regulating the hours and wages of the employees. The defendant has filed a motion to dismiss the complaint as amended on the ground that it does not state any fact showing jurisdiction of this Court in the cause.

The complaint as amended states “plaintiffs were employed' by the defendant * * * to' clean brick, wood and other materials salvaged from old structures, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Carter v. Carter Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jewel Tea Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  2. Wood v. Central Sand & Gravel Co.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1940
  3. Kohler v. JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
  4. Gordon v. Paducah Ice Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1941
  5. United States v. Watchmakers of Switzerland Information Center, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API