Legal Opinion
United States v. Watchmakers of Switzerland Information Center, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 13, 1955PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALSH, District Judge.
Five of the defendants in the above entitled action have moved to dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdetion over their persons. The motions were argued together.
In this action several Swiss and American organizations are charged with violations of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1, in that they allegedly have combined and conspired unreasonably to restrain interstate and foreign trade and commerce in watches, component parts and repair parts, and also with violation of the Wilson Tariff Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 8. It may be roughly summarized as a claim that Swiss…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- United States v. Scophony Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Hutchinson v. Chase & Gilbert, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Kilpatrick v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Fisher v. First National Bank of OmahaDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1972
- Goldlawr, Incorporated v. ShubertDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
- Pacific Seafarers, Inc. v. Pacific Far East Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- Rayco Manufacturing Co. v. Chicopee Manufacturing Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.