Hilman v. Brigham
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Woodbury District Court. — Hon. George W. Wakefield, Judge. Action of replevin to recover the possession of personal property upon which a landlord’s writ of attachment had been levied. Trial to the court, and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendants appeal. —
1Opinion of the Court
Sherwtn, J. —
1 *722 *71The defendant Brigham was the landlord of one Boltz, under a lease providing for the payment of rent monthly, on the first day thereof. On the twenty-second day of December, 1897, Brigham commenced suit against Boltz for the rent due January 1, 1898, and thereafter, and caused a landlord’s writ of - attachment to issue, which the defendant sheriff on the same day levied on the personal property in controversy. On the eighteenth day of December, 1897, Boltz sold the property to this plaintiff, who brought this action, for the possession thereof, on the thirtieth day of the same…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Edwards & Beardsley v. Cottrell & BabcockSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
- Campbell v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1874
- Merrit v. FisherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
- Waterhouse v. BlackSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
- Hays v. BerrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sylvester v. AmmonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Harlan v. MennengaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
- Remington Typewriter Co. v. McArthurSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909