Legal Opinion

Waterhouse v. Black

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 26, 1893PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Louisa District Cowrt. — How. W. R. Lewis, Judge. ActioN to recover the possession of specific personal property. There was a trial by the court without a jury, and a judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant appeals. —

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, C. J.

The petition alleges that the 'plaintiff is entitled to the immediate possession of the .surplus of thirty-five acres of corn growing on the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of section 24, in .township 73 north, of range 2 west, after deducting the amount due Souster, Cabeen & Humbert, as evidenced by a mortgage given to them on the fourth day of October, 1889, and also to the immediate possession of two-•thirds often acres of corn growing on the southwest quarter of the southwest, quarter of the same section; •that he acquired such right of possession by virtue of a chattel…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Morse v. BealeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  2. Campbell v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1874
  3. Kern v. WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. PeirceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  2. Loranz & Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  3. Richards v. W. H. Hellen & SonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  4. J. E. Paulson & Co. v. WardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Flickinger v. Mark IV Apartments, Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API