Legal Opinion

Sylvester v. Ammons

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 16, 1904PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Hardin District Court.— How. J. !R. Whit-AKER, Judge. ActioN in replevin. Judgment for plaintiff, and both parties appeal; that of defendants being perfected first.

1Opinion of the Court

Ladd, J.—

On the 24th day of February, 1902, D. W. Townsend, as agent of the plaintiff, entered into a contract by virtue of which he conveyed to the defendant, J. E. Ammons, a hotel property at Independence, Iowa, and some land in Missouri, estimated to be worth $1,700, in consideration of *142which the latter delivered to said agent a certain stock of merchandise at Eldora, this State. Under the agreement the goods were to be inventoried “ at cost price as shown upon the goods, except such goods as be damaged, and they to be taken at their actual worth.” Ammons acted for himself in making the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Enos v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Whitworth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  3. Graves v. Merchants & Bankers' InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
  4. Smith v. JensenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
  5. Phelps, Dodge & Palmer Co. v. SamsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Dale v. Case, Et Ux.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Urbany v. City of CarrollSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  3. Baron v. Crossroads Center of Iowa, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  4. Marx v. KingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  5. Low v. YoungSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API