Legal Opinion

People v. Klinck

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 31, 2011No. 10SA361PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hobbs

In this interlocutory appeal, the prosecution challenges the trial court's suppression of statements made by the defendant, Wayne Klinek, while being questioned in connection with an assault on Klinek's girlfriend, D.B. Responding to a domestic disturbance report, police officers arrived at D.B.'s house and asked Klinck to remain on the porch while the officers interviewed D.B. Shortly thereafter, an officer spoke with Klinck and, when the officer determined he had probable cause, placed Klinck under arrest.

Klinck was advised of his rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BayeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  2. Mumford v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012
  3. People v. AllmanColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. People v. BegaySupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
  5. Phillips v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API