Legal Opinion
Hyatt Regency Phoenix Hotel Co. v. Winston & Strawn
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided March 7, 1995No. 1 CA-CV 92-0133PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRANT, Judge.
This appeal and cross-appeal arise from plaintiffs’ (collectively “HRP”) suit against defendant Winston & Strawn for the legal malpractice of its former partner, Arthur Greenfield. We affirm the judgment for compensatory and punitive damages against Winston & Strawn but reverse part of the trial court’s award of credit for partial satisfaction against the judgment.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
We view the facts and all inferences in the light most favorable to sustaining the jury verdict and resulting judgment. Bradshaw v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 157 Ariz. 411,…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Honda Motor Co. v. ObergSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Linthicum v. Nationwide Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1986
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Dawson v. WithycombeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Golonka v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- Bowden v. Caldor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Desert Palm Surgical Group, P.L.C. v. PettaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- Security Title Agency, Inc. v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.