People v. Fox
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Upon our review of the record, we agree with the suppression court that the investigators’ statements about obtaining psychiatric help for defendant did not constitute a promise which rendered defendant’s statement involuntary under either CPL 60.45 (2) (b) (i) or (ii). The statements in no way created a substantial risk that defendant would falsely incriminate himself (CPL 60.45 [2] [b] [i]; People v Giangrasso, 109 AD2d 750; People v Diaz, 77 AD2d 523, affd 54 NY2d 967, cert denied 455 US 957), nor were the statements made as a promise of an…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- People v. Sunset BayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- People v. DiazAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- People v. DiazNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. RichardsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. LyonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. CarrierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. KeeneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. EngertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.